To many people – including me – one of the most exciting apps on your smartphone is Instagram, the online photo-sharing and social networking service initially popular on the iPhone and which exploded out into the mainstream during 2012.
I discovered Instagram when it released its mobile app for Android devices earlier this year.
Since then I’ve been the archetypal ‘happy snapper‘ where I find myself looking at my world through the mobile lens of opportunity in wondering how what I’m seeing will look with an Instagram filter applied to it.
Like much of the social web and the tools and services you can use, it’s a free service: you install the mobile app, sign up and off you go. You might have paused and decided whether you wanted your pics to be open to anyone on the net, or just to people you approve connections with beforehand. Most people are open, whether they’re Instagrammers for personal pleasure or whether they’re curating and publishing content on behalf of their organization or brand.
Either way, you have that choice. Which brings me to the primary point of this post: choice.
A few days ago, Instagram announced changes to its terms of service that will come into effect on January 16, 2013. The changes have provoked howls of protest on Twitter and across much of the social web. Indeed, I’ve joined many of the voices in saying that it may well be time up for me on Instagram next month.
I think my love affair with Instagram will end on Jan 15 or sooner bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/17/wha… Maybe Facebook as well.
— Neville Hobson (@jangles) December 18, 2012
There are two specific elements in the updated terms that have caused the most disquiet among users, me included:
Instagram can share information about its users with Facebook (its parent company) as well as outside affiliates and advertisers.
You (your identity) and your pics could star in an advertisement without your knowledge.
In its announcement – made as an image posted to its Instagram account – the magazine said “We are very concerned with the direction of the proposed new terms of service and if they remain as presented we may close our account.”
Lot’s of ‘we may…’ in there but the concern is plain to see.
I interpret the new conditions including the ones I highlighted above as meaning, in essence, that Facebook-owned Instagram (or maybe Facebook itself) claims a perpetual right to license all public Instagram photos including mine to any company or other organization it chooses, without any prior notification to me or any kind of payment, attribution or recognition.
If continuing with Instagram means going along with that, then I would choose not to.
If that’s what it does mean – and plenty of credible voices say indeed it does – then I intend to close my account. It’s such a pity as I think Instagram is pretty unique – it beats Flickr’s mobile app for Android and experience hands down – and I will be sad if I do stop using the service for reasons like this.
However, I’m not making any hasty moves as nothing will happen before January 16. Well, actually, a lot might happen before January 16, eg, Instagram possibly changing its mind in some ways in response to a growing backlash such as National Geographic’s position.
In a blog post yesterday, Instagram CEO Kevin Systrom said “We’ve heard loud and clear that many users are confused and upset about what the changes mean,” saying that the company will modify specific parts of the terms to make it more clear what will happen with users’ photos.
Specifically, Systrom stated:
Advertising on Instagram From the start, Instagram was created to become a business. Advertising is one of many ways that Instagram can become a self-sustaining business, but not the only one. Our intention in updating the terms was to communicate that we’d like to experiment with innovative advertising that feels appropriate on Instagram. Instead it was interpreted by many that we were going to sell your photos to others without any compensation. This is not true and it is our mistake that this language is confusing. To be clear: it is not our intention to sell your photos. We are working on updated language in the terms to make sure this is clear.
[…] Ownership Rights Instagram users own their content and Instagram does not claim any ownership rights over your photos. Nothing about this has changed. We respect that there are creative artists and hobbyists alike that pour their heart into creating beautiful photos, and we respect that your photos are your photos. Period.
Very encouraging, a testament as to why listening to online conversations and then joining those conversations appropriately and swiftly is so key to social business success today.
So I plan to keep on snapping as I pay attention to developments between now and January 16. I’d recommend that stance to anyone, whether an individual Instagrammer like me or a business user like National Geographic. Take a look, too, at some thought-provoking points from Dan York on things to think about before you click that ‘close account’ button.’
I’m more optimistic than I was yesterday about a continuing relationship with Instagram.
(The ‘Keep Calm’ image at top courtesy of Mitch Joel who posted it to – where else? – his Instagram account.)
[Update December 21, 2012:] In a blog past yesterday, Instagram CEO Kevin Systrom said that the proposed changes to the terms of service in relation to advertising would not happen next month.
There was confusion and real concern about what Instagram’s possible advertising products could look like, he said, and how they would work.
[…] Because of the feedback we have heard from you, we are reverting this advertising section to the original version that has been in effect since we launched the service in October 2010. You can see the updated terms here.
Going forward, rather than obtain permission from you to introduce possible advertising products we have not yet developed, we are going to take the time to complete our plans, and then come back to our users and explain how we would like for our advertising business to work.
You also had deep concerns about whether under our new terms, Instagram had any plans to sell your content. I want to be really clear: Instagram has no intention of selling your photos, and we never did. We don’t own your photos – you do.
This is good news for users and for Instagram. It’s also testament to Systrom’s leadership in listening and making a swift decision to change course based on what customers had said.
I think such action has given him a huge benefit of trust – an important element in his company’s overall relationship with users when it comes to other related issues such as privacy and the updated terms of service concerning that.
Yesterday, I started experimenting with EyeEm, a startup based in Berlin, Germany, and a good alternative to Instagram. Their Android app is very good – there are versions also for iPhone and Windows phones – offering different filters and some things I think are better than Instagram.
My thinking was that, while I’m in wait-and-see mode regarding Instagram’s proposed changes, I would look at what competing services are out there in case I did decide to leave Instagram by January 16.
While I will continue exploring what EyeEm offers – here’s my EyeEm page – I’m willing to give Kevin Systrom my trust and continue as an Instagram user.
- If you’re a WordPress user, check out DsgnWrks Instagram Importer, a plugin that lets you import and backup your Instagram photos to your WordPress site. The latest version compatible with WordPress versions 3.1 to 3.5 was released yesterday, December 20. The developer says the plugin includes robust options to allow you to control the imported posts formatting including built-in support for WordPress custom post-types, custom taxonomies, post-formats, and more.