Updated on July 16, 2010
Central to Foremski’s passionate argument that the demise of the press release would be welcome – indeed, should be encouraged – was a simple journalist’s view:
[…] Press releases are created by committees, edited by lawyers, and then sent out at great expense through Businesswire or PRnewswire to reach the digital and physical trash bins of tens of thousands of journalists.
Whether you agree with Foremski’s views or not, his post unleashed months if not years of debate among many in the PR community, online and offline, about the effectiveness or otherwise of the press release, asking: If it’s so useless, what should replace it?
Spurred by Foremski’s rant, Todd Defren pioneered the concept of the social media press release in 2006, offering a template as an open source contribution to the debate.
The social media release was broadly designed to reflect an evolution in the usefulness of how reporters and editors might prefer to receive announcements, geared more to copy-and-paste and useful links to rich related content elsewhere online than just providing narratives that they ignore anyway.
So what’s happened during the past four years other than debate? Did the press release die? Many experimented with the social media release. Businesses sprang up offering distribution services for such releases (which always seemed slightly oxymoronic to me: publishing your social media release somewhere online is the distribution).
It didn’t really take off, for reasons as varied as because there is no consistent structure or presentation format, lack of understanding on how it is meant to work, and huge lack of interest from journalists.
Does the social media release have a role in the communication toolboxes of PR pros?
I believe it does, depending on many factors including the measurable objective you’re trying to achieve where an announcement of some kind communicated some way (eg, via a press release) plays a key role in you achieving your objective and the recipient of your announcement achieving his or her objective.
Rather than try and replace the traditional press release with a social media version – something that quite a few in the PR community strongly advocated when Foremksi’s post created the initial kerfuffle – I suggest using both in a complementary fashion.
That way, you’ll meet the needs of those who want to receive traditional press releases by email as well as those who will benefit from the interactivity of the social media version.
And who knows – if you offer high quality and well targeted content in both, you might start something evolutionary.
(Originally published on the WCG Common Sense blog.)