Iâ€™d not heard of Muck Rack before reading Mashableâ€™s report on a new service the company has just launched â€“ the one-line news release distribution via Twitter.
Muck Rackâ€™s prime claim to fame to date is as a place on the web that aggregates tweets from journalists, mainly in the US, in real time.
Now comes the Twitter release service.
[â€¦] a new service for PR pros to publish one line press releases, up to 130 characters long, that can include links to other media and press kits, at a rate of $1 per character with a $50 minimum.
Muck Rack is hoping to capitalize on the short attention span of journalists and the anxious PR people who want to reach them quickly and in short-form. Should you opt to use their service, just type your tweet-like release, hit submit, pay through PayPal, and voilÃ : your release gets published to Muck Rackâ€™s release page and shared via their Twitter account (which currently has just 3,433 followers).
Anything youâ€™d send via this service begins with the word â€˜RELEASE,â€™ in upper case. (Thereâ€™s 7 characters used up before you begin.)
Iâ€™m not sure I see a viable market for this. If youâ€™re a PR with a Twitter account, you could do exactly the same and save yourself the fee. Of course, your followers wonâ€™t be the same as Muck Rackâ€™s, but youâ€™d likely have a clearer more focused sense of who youâ€™re pitching.
Looking at it from a receiverâ€™s point of view, though, would you see 140-character announcement tweets from PRs youâ€™re following, all starting with â€˜RELEASE,â€™ as just so much spam? And with some third-party Twitter apps â€“ notably TweetDeck â€“ itâ€™s just a couple of easy clicks to automatically block a sender and report the account to Twitter as a spammer.
I could see plenty of irritated journos doing just that.
Still, some people may welcome the brevity of announcements via Twitter. If theyâ€™re people you know and trust, and who have explained to you what theyâ€™re doing before hitting you with that first Muck Rack tweet, that might make a difference. In other words, give you an opportunity to opt in beforehand.
[â€¦] if more and more journalists get hip to the service, and better news get released via Muck Rack, then you could have a potential situation where bloggers, journalists, and reporters have their eyes glued to Muck Rackâ€™s Twitter stream and news page. Should that be the case, many a PR pro will gladly pay the $1 per character for that type of exposure. It all comes down to audience, attention span, and clout. Itâ€™s one of those chicken and egg situations.
Not sure about chicken and eggs but you shouldnâ€™t dismiss out of hand anything as far as Twitterâ€™s concerned. Thereâ€™s even an FAQ for journalists about this service.
It looks like the first major use of the service will be at the BlogHer conference on July 24-25, according to an announcement on the Muck Rack site:
PepsiCo joins Muck Rack 1LPRS as a launch partner to syndicate news from the #BlogHer conference on July 24-25
Where thereâ€™s a niche, thereâ€™s an opportunity.
[Blog] Would Muck Rack meet your PR need? http://tinyurl.com/moqyuz
Hmm, I can’t see this taking off – it looks like too much of a gimick to me. I agree with you that PR practitioners should just do it themselves. If they are using Twitter correctly to build strong erlationships with journalists why would they need this. I am sure some companies will give it a whirl though after the headlines it is getting.
On a wider perspective, aren’t going a bit twitter-crazy? We are seeing services pop up using twitter for a whole number of things:micro payments, games, sign-in apps, ad-tweets…
Just because we can do anything does not mean that everything makes sense. I personally use twitter to talk with whoever wishes to listen. I do not want it to tell everyone that I am lending 5â‚¬ to a friend or that brand X which means nothing to me is having a huge sale next friday; much less yell RELEASE before tweeting something that will only be relevant to 10% of my followers.
Too many of these uses for twitter can dilute the conversation to a point of no return. But I trust that the answer to this will come from the developers who can help us block out the noise.
Very interesting idea that is still in it’s infancy. In theory this seems like a viable option right now while Twitter users are still trying to figure out the process, however, when more users adopt and use the system I think Muck Rack will ultimately or have to slash their prices.