YouTube: the global TV channel

I caught a few minutes of President Obama’s Google+ Hangout last night as it was streamed on YouTube.

If you’ve done a Google+ Hangout video chat before, you’ll be familiar with the format and this was no different. Except, of course, it was the President of the United States plus five lucky citizens chosen by +The White House to hang out live with the Pres in a carefully-controlled setting. Plus the millions of people worldwide who tuned in, as it were, to YouTube to watch and add text comments. Plus those doing the same on Google+, Facebook, Twitter… wherever they were online.

‘Tuned in’ is an apt descriptor as the immediate thought I had when I did just that on Google+ was “This is TV.”

If last year’s Royal Wedding that was broadcast live on YouTube was a demo of YouTube as a TV channel – a global one at that – that captures imaginations with a compelling event (content, in a word), then yesterday’s presidential Hangout is surely a clear sign that the channel just changed.

Why watch TV on a TV any more when you can immerse yourself, interact on the net, share your experiences and the recorded content itself, via any capable device that connects online?

Talk about disruption! No wonder the US entertainment industry – and that includes mainstream media like TV – likes things like #SOPA and #PIPA, to which +Clay Shirky‘s call to “pick up the pitchforks” is so compelling.

Reshared post from +The White House

Missed the Hangout with President Obama? Check out the full video here and let us know what you thought.

Google+: View post on Google+

Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.

Pick up the pitchforks

Powerful stuff from +Clay Shirky who describes the US entertainment and media industry thus in his call to ‘pick up the pitchforks’ re SOPA and PIPA:

“[...] This is an industry that demands payment from summer camps if the kids sing Happy Birthday or God Bless America, an industry that issues takedown notices for a 29-second home movie of a toddler dancing to Prince. Traditional American media firms are implacably opposed to any increase in citizens’ ability to create, copy, save, alter, or share media on our own. They fought against cassette audio tapes, and photocopiers. They swore the VCR would destroy Hollywood. They tried to kill Tivo. They tried to kill MiniDisc. They tried to kill player pianos. They do this whenever a technology increases user freedom over media. Every time. Every single time.And they don’t just want control — they want it at low cost, and high speed.”

Embedded Link

Pick up the pitchforks: David Pogue underestimates Hollywood « Clay Shirky
Writing in his blog on the New York Times yesterday, David Pogue, one of the Times’ tech columnists, advises toning down the alarmist rhetoric over SOPA, suggesting that opponents of the bill (and…

Google+: Reshared 1 times
Google+: View post on Google+

Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.

Related posts:

Hollywood had Chris Dodd and a press release, Silicon Valley had Facebook

A nice sound bite in a frothy report by US entertainment industry columnist and blogger +Sharon Waxman about yesterday’s online protests against SOPA and PIPA.

If you remember the core of this issue, it’s seen by many as Hollywood and vested interests versus the rest of us. Sort of the 1% against the 99%.

I’m not sure I’d liken it to a war zone – emotional rhetoric isn’t really helpful – yet this assessment looking at the PR aspects isn’t bad at all.

The bottom line:

It seems that Hollywood still does not realize that it is in the information age. Knowledge moves in real time, and events move accordingly. The medium is the message in a fight like this.

Embedded Link

Sunk! How Hollywood Lost the PR Battle Over SOPA | The Wrap Media
Hollywood had Chris Dodd and a press release. Silicon Valley had Facebook

Google+: View post on Google+

Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.

To extend Waxman ‘s analogy a little further, battle may be won yesterday but a war still wages.

On the matter of the MPAA press release, I like Ike Pigott’s suggested edits that would make the message a little more authentic. :)

Related post:

The SOPA blackout

From 5am GMT today, January 18, one of the top-ten most visited websites on the internet is unavailable for 24 hours – if you visit English-language Wikipedia, you’ll just get a page with a text concisely explaining why you can’t get the content you came for.

wikipediablack18jan12

In a press release on January 16, the Wikimedia Foundation – owner of Wikipedia – said:

[...] the Wikipedia community has chosen to blackout the English version of Wikipedia for 24 hours, in protest against proposed legislation in the United States — the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) in the U.S. House of Representatives, and PROTECTIP (PIPA) in the U.S. Senate. If passed, this legislation will harm the free and open Internet and bring about new tools for censorship of international websites inside the United States.

(For more about SOPA and PIPA, Google has some easy-to-understand information focused on the US; the BBC looks at SOPA and PIPA from the broader international perspective.) [Later: BBC technology correspondent Rory Cellan-Jones adds a depth assessment of SOPA and PIPA in his report Wikipedia - what can it tell us about Sopa?]

Wikipedia isn’t the only web resource to go offline today – other high-profile sites include Boing Boing and Reddit (the latter only for 12 hours). It’s notable that the heavyweights on the social web are conspicuous by their absence of action like today’s. So you’ll find business as usual at places like Twitter, Facebook and Google+.

As a way to raise awareness of the twin legislative approaches being addressed by US elected representatives, it will undoubtedly have a big impact, particularly in the US. I wonder, though, what Wikipedia’s (and the others’) measurable goal is. Or is it sufficient to simply get awareness raised around the world and over time we might see some kind of result? After all, SOPA itself is off the legislative agenda for now.

Plenty of opinion on that.

In the meantime, what will you do if you can’t get Wikipedia content today? You could try others from a dozen alternative resources Mashable suggests. If you speak other languages and if you’re looking for explanations of things rather than simply linking to them, try the other language versions of Wikipedia – they’re all up.

Or simply postpone your “what, why, how and where” searching just for a day. It’ll all be there again tomorrow.

[Update 1100 GMT] I discovered that I can access much of Wikiepdia on the mobile website. So far, every page I’ve gone to on my mobile device has shown up.

Actually, the mobile website works on a desktop computer too. Try it for yourself. Not everything will show up – some links redirect to the main website and you’ll get the blackout overlay page. Best bet: use the mobile site on your mobile device if you can’t do without English Wikipedia for a day.

It’s not much of a blackout from what I can see.

When Russian diplomacy and social media meet

requeststhepleasureWhen I arrived at the Russian ambassador’s residence in London on October 13, I was expecting a pat-down from tough-looking security guards. Or, at the very least, requests for picture ID.

Clearly my stereotypical perceptions are a bit out of touch as I experienced none of those when I got there on dark Thursday evening. Just a smiling man in a smart suit at the entrance gate with a printed list of names of those invited and expected, and a hand-wave to proceed into the grounds with a short walk to the entrance into the elegant and historic building.

The occasion was what the invitation I received described as a “digital barbecue“: a gathering of “leading British and Russian bloggers and social media experts” (the covering email said) on how governments should be engaging with the web and social media, including two 45-minute panel discussions on “governmental interaction with bloggers and other social media, and on concepts of e-democracy.” I’m reasonably sure that this was the first such event of its type held in London by any embassy.

So I RSVP’d, arrived at the gate and soon joined what looked to me to be about 70 others invited to listen to the panel discussions and join in the socializing that followed with food and drink.

The panel discussions were quite interesting, I suppose, although I found the Westminster bubble focus of much of the opinions expressed to be disappointing (I heard too little about e-democracy and too much anecdotal personal experiences of some of the panelists). Perhaps the most relevant thing anyone said was e-democracy “closes the gap between politician and citizen.” I wish that notion had been expanded upon and explored by the panels.

Still, the conversations and exchanges of views I had after the panels when being social with people were worthwhile. I also had an opportunity to speak briefly with Russian ambassador to the UK Alexander Yakovenko, a most affable and friendly man.

AlexanderYakovenkoAmbassador Yakovenko was a gracious host, introducing the event at the start with a prepared speech that had everyone’s attention. His concluding speech was most interesting, where he said he started tweeting out of frustration over an inability to get the Russian side of the Alexander Litvinenko story out in the UK media.

Litvinenko was an ex-KGB and -FSB officer who was murdered in London in 2006 in a James Bond-esque assassination by polonium poisoning. Fingers have been pointed at Russian government involvement ever since; the case was a major discussion topic during Prime Minister David Cameron’s recent official visit to Moscow.

So at the digital barbecue last Thursday, Ambassador Yakovenko took the opportunity to express his government’s point of view about perspectives on that assassination.

I wondered whether the real point of the evening was to provide Mr Yakovenko with that opportunity. After all, it’s still a hot topic, he’s a career politician and a diplomat – formerly the Deputy Foreign Minister of the Russian Federation as well as spokesman and director of the Russian government’s Information and Press Department – and we were a receptive audience including political bloggers and mainstream media people.

Plus there was a pre-inquest review hearing about Litvinenko’s death scheduled for October 13 at St Pancras Coroner’s Court which, the Russians said, was “closed for the public and media, thus making it impossible for Russian media and the Russian Embassy’s representatives to attend.” [Development reported by Reuters today: "Litvinenko widow launches appeal for inquest cash."]

Whether all that was a factor or not in why the Russians planned this digital barbecue, I think it was a success in achieving a goal to connect Russian influencers with British opinion-formers who use social media. If such connections are bilaterally nurtured and developed, then we could see some interesting developments in building “opinion bridges” between influencers in these countries where social media plays a useful role in a new diplomacy. Mr Yakovenko said he hopes to do it again next year.

You can get a good flavour of the digital barbecue by checking the Twitter hashtag #digitalbbq and its linked content. And connect with our Russian friends on Twitter:

[Photo above of Alexander Yakovenko by Stuart Bruce.]