If you have to serve on a jury in a criminal trial, youâ€™d more than likely think very carefully about discussing that trial outside the jury room and whatâ€™s going on in court.
You wouldnâ€™t blog about it, tweet it or write on your wall about it. Would you?
No such worries for a woman juror in Burnley, UK, who ran a poll on Facebook asking her friends to vote on whether they thought the accused were guilty or not.
[â€¦] The woman posted details of the child abduction and sex assault case on the website. Then she told friends: â€œI donâ€™t know which way to go, so Iâ€™m holding a poll.â€
Jurors are forbidden from discussing details of cases even with their closest family members. The woman was dismissed after a tip-off to Burnley Crown Court, Lancs. The trial continued with 11 jurors. It was thought she did not use privacy settings, meaning the Facebook posts could be read by anyone.
Last night a legal source said the juror could have been charged with contempt of court â€” and the trial scrapped. The expert added: â€œIt defies belief. She obviously has no grasp of how the judicial process works in this country. She had been asking her mates what they thought â€” and some people came back with guilty verdicts.â€